Ravenna vs

Serval

Ravenna vs. Serval

Ravenna vs. Serval

Own the results, not code. An AI Native Enterprise Service Management platform without the maintenance burden.

Talk to Sales

The AI Native Service Desk

Capabilities

Automation approach

Generated code from text prompts

Generative workflows + visual builder

Code ownership

Customer owns and maintains it

Ravenna maintains it

When APIs change

Customer fixes broken code

Ravenna updates integrations

When engineers leave

Risk of unmaintainable technical debt

Workflows keep running

Technical requirement

Requires technical team to audit and maintain

Non-technical teams can build

Cross-Department Support

Heavy IT focus

IT, HR, RevOps native

CSAT

Not supported

Fully supported

SLAs

Not supported

Fully supported

Automation approach

Generated code from text prompts

Generative workflows + visual builder

Code ownership

Customer owns and maintains it

Ravenna maintains it

When APIs change

Customer fixes broken code

Ravenna updates integrations

When engineers leave

Risk of unmaintainable technical debt

Workflows keep running

Technical requirement

Requires technical team to audit and maintain

Non-technical teams can build

Cross-Department Support

Heavy IT focus

IT, HR, RevOps native

CSAT

Not supported

Fully supported

SLAs

Not supported

Fully supported

Features

FAQ

The Code Ownership Problem

Pain: Serval generates actual code from your text prompts. You get the automation, but you also get a codebase. That code needs to be audited, understood, and maintained by your team. With Ravenna: No code to own. Ravenna’s visual workflow builder creates automations that we maintain. You describe what you want, and the platform handles the execution layer. Why it matters: Most IT teams don’t want another codebase to manage. They want results. Ravenna delivers automation without the side effect of technical debt.

The Maintenance Burden

Pain: When Okta updates their API, or Jamf changes an endpoint, Serval’s generated code breaks. Your team is responsible for debugging and fixing it. The engineer who originally “vibe coded” the solution may have moved on. With Ravenna: We maintain the integrations. When APIs change, we update our platform. Your workflows keep running without your team lifting a finger. Why it matters: Automation should reduce operational burden, not create a new category of maintenance work. Serval shifts the liability to you. Ravenna absorbs it.

The Key Person Risk

Pain: Serval’s model assumes your IT team can audit and maintain custom code. But what happens when the engineer who built the automation leaves? You’re left with code that nobody fully understands. With Ravenna: Workflows are visible, documented, and maintainable by any team member. The visual builder means no specialized knowledge is required to understand or modify automations. Why it matters: Technical debt compounds. Code without an owner becomes a liability. Ravenna’s managed approach eliminates this risk entirely.

The Hidden Cost of “Vibe Coding”

Pain: Generating code from natural language sounds powerful. But “vibe coding” produces output that needs to be validated, tested, and supported long-term. The initial generation is fast. The ongoing ownership is expensive. With Ravenna: The visual workflow builder is transparent and maintainable. Non-technical team members can understand, modify, and extend automations. There’s no black-box code to reverse-engineer. Why it matters: The true cost of automation isn’t the build. It’s the maintenance over years. Serval front-loads the magic and back-loads the burden. Ravenna spreads the simplicity across the entire lifecycle.

Modernize and automate your
service desk with Ravenna

Modernize and automate your
service desk with Ravenna

Ravenna Software, Inc., 2025

Ravenna Software, Inc., 2025

Ravenna Software, Inc., 2025

Ravenna Software, Inc., 2025